The respondent father brought a motion to change a final parenting order, seeking increased unsupervised parenting time based on alleged changes to his bail conditions.
The applicant mother opposed, arguing no material change in circumstances and that a variation was not in the children's best interests.
The mother also sought a declaration that the father was a vexatious litigant and an order precluding further motions without leave.
The court dismissed the father's motion, finding he failed to establish a material change in circumstances and that a variation was not in the children's best interests.
The court declared the father a vexatious litigant due to his persistent and unreasonable conduct, including failure to comply with orders and provide disclosure, and ordered him to obtain leave for any future proceedings.
Full recovery costs were awarded to the mother due to the father's bad faith conduct.