The appellants appealed a trial judgment declaring the respondent the owner of a parcel of land and ordering its conveyance.
The trial judge found that the appellants promised to convey the land to the respondent in exchange for road construction work.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable or overriding error in the trial judge's factual findings.
The Court also held that the agreement was not frustrated by municipal conditions and that written municipal applications signed by the appellant satisfied the requirements of section 4 of the Statute of Frauds.
