The appellants appealed a Small Claims Court judgment finding them jointly and severally liable for breach of a home renovation contract.
The individual appellant argued that only his corporation should be liable.
The Divisional Court allowed the introduction of fresh evidence because the appellant was self-represented at trial.
However, the court dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the trial judge's conclusion that the individual appellant failed to make it clear he was contracting solely on behalf of his corporation.
