The parties brought cross-motions regarding child support, spousal support, and financial disclosure following a 2017 final order.
The respondent had unilaterally reduced her child support payments to a set-off amount, arguing that the shared parenting schedule triggered section 9 of the Child Support Guidelines.
The court found the respondent in breach of the final order, which clearly mandated full table support, and ordered her to pay $36,124 in support arrears.
The court also ordered the respondent to provide outstanding financial disclosure, including Notices of Assessment and documentation for business expenses, while dismissing the applicant's claims for older business records and certain section 7 expenses.
