The defendants were charged with multiple offences relating to an alleged armed home invasion and robbery.
The Crown relied on circumstantial evidence, including security video footage, to place the defendants at the scene.
The defence argued that no home invasion occurred and that the occupants of the apartment staged the scene to cover up an accidental discharge of their own firearm.
The court found both the Crown's and the defence's theories equally plausible based on the physical evidence and witness testimony.
As the Crown failed to prove its version of events beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendants were found not guilty of all charges.
