The applicant father brought a motion for temporary custody or a shared parenting arrangement of the parties' 20-month-old child.
The respondent mother brought a cross-motion for temporary child support.
The court dismissed the father's motion, finding it in the child's best interests to remain in the primary care of the mother, who offered a more stable plan.
On the issue of child support, the court found the father, a self-employed individual, failed to provide accurate and complete financial disclosure.
The court imputed an annual income of $100,000 to the father and ordered him to pay table child support and a proportionate share of day-care expenses.
