Judicial review dismissed as the RAD reasonably found insufficient evidence of forward-looking risk from a gang.
The applicant sought judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision dismissing her appeal from the Refugee Protection Division (RPD).
She claimed fear of persecution from her former husband's gang in Jamaica.
The RAD found insufficient evidence of the gang's existence or her husband's involvement, and no forward-looking risk.
The applicant argued the RAD failed to properly apply gender guidelines to explain omissions in her narrative.
The Federal Court held the RAD reasonably assessed the evidence and dismissed the application for judicial review.
