The parties separated after an 18-year marriage.
At trial, the court determined issues regarding the equalization of net family property, the sale of the jointly owned matrimonial home, and retroactive variation of child support.
The court ordered the sale of the matrimonial home and a jointly owned rental property, finding no malicious or oppressive conduct by the respondent to prevent the sale.
The court also determined the valuation of various disputed assets, including real estate, vehicles, jewelry, and household contents, often drawing adverse inferences against the applicant for selling assets without notice or consent.
Finally, the court reduced the respondent's child support arrears due to his low income and reliance on social assistance.
