The applicant in a family law proceeding brought a motion to amend her pleadings to add her spouse's corporation as a third party, seeking repayment of alleged demand loans.
The corporation opposed the motion, arguing that the limitation period had expired because the original family law application constituted a demand for payment.
The court allowed the motion, finding it was not plain and obvious that the original application, which named only the spouse, constituted a clear and unequivocal demand to the corporation itself.
The applicant was permitted to amend her reply to add the corporation as a party.
