The children's aid society brought a motion for summary judgment seeking an order to place a four-year-old child in extended society care without access for the purpose of adoption.
The parents opposed the motion, proposing alternative plans of care.
The court applied the principles of summary judgment in the child protection context and found no genuine issue requiring a trial.
The court determined that the parents' plans were not viable due to a history of domestic violence, substance abuse, and failure to utilize offered resources.
The court granted the society's motion, ordering extended care without parental access, but allowed access for the child's half-sister.