The applicant sought an interim order for equal parenting time with the child of the marriage.
The parties, married in 2010 and separated in 2022, continued to reside in the matrimonial home with extended family.
The respondent opposed the motion, arguing it was premature given unresolved issues like housing and support, and that mediation should precede a formal order.
The court found the affidavit evidence conflicting and declined to make credibility findings at this early stage.
The motion for a 50/50 parenting schedule was dismissed, with the court emphasizing the maintenance of the status quo and the need for the parties to resolve broader issues through mediation and a full case conference.
Specific interim orders were made to guide parental conduct and communication.
