The complainant sought to enforce two summonses served on witnesses.
The Board found that neither summons was enforceable.
One summons was served outside the Board's jurisdiction in Michigan and was accompanied by a money order rather than cash.
The other summons was also accompanied by a money order, which does not constitute proper conduct money under the rules.
The Board ruled that conduct money must be paid in cash, not by cheque or money order, and that service must occur within the Board's jurisdiction.
