Following a trial in a matrimonial proceeding, the court determined issues of equalization, spousal support, child support, and access.
The court found that shares held by the respondent were beneficially owned by his father and excluded them from equalization.
The court declined to grant the applicant a right of first refusal to purchase the matrimonial home, ordering its sale absent agreement.
For support purposes, the respondent's employee retention bonus was included in his 2014 income.
Spousal support was ordered at the mid-range of the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, as the court found the applicant's new relationship was not yet spouse-like.
Access was ordered according to the respondent's requested schedule, but made subject to the 14-year-old child's wishes.
