The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that his injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The matter proceeded to a written hearing.
The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence, despite multiple notices from the Tribunal.
Consequently, the Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet his burden of proof.
The application was dismissed, and the applicant was found to remain within the MIG and not entitled to the disputed treatment plans or interest.
