The applicant sought approval of accounts relating to the guardianship of an incapable person’s property and personal care.
An objector challenged the accounts, alleging unlisted assets, inadequate disclosure, and a failure by the guardian to investigate alleged misappropriation by a prior attorney for property.
The court held that the objector’s allegations were speculative and unsupported by evidence and that the guardian was not obligated to investigate historic allegations absent credible proof, particularly where a court-approved management plan governed the guardianship.
The court also emphasized that objections inconsistent with a previously consented management plan required evidence of new or previously undiscoverable information.
The accounts were approved and the objections dismissed.