The plaintiff brought an action against the police for negligence, trespass, conversion, and Charter violations arising from their response to her complaint of voyeurism against her domestic partner.
The defendants brought a cross-motion to strike portions of the claim, arguing they disclosed no reasonable cause of action.
The plaintiff brought a motion for a fresh examination for discovery, alleging that the defendants' counsel thwarted the initial discoveries through improper refusals and uncivil conduct.
The court dismissed the motion to strike, finding the pleadings properly supported the claims regarding the plaintiff's mistreatment.
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for fresh discoveries, concluding that the defendants' counsel took an erroneous position on relevance and engaged in unwarranted personal attacks that undermined the discovery process.
