1 total
Interim remote schooling ordered pending OCL involvement and Voice of the Child Report.
The applicant mother and respondent father both brought motions seeking primary residency and to determine the school enrollment for their 12-year-old son after both parents relocated to different cities.
Given the conflicting evidence, lack of cross-examinations, and absence of input from the child, the court declined to make a substantive residency order.
Instead, the court made an interim interim without prejudice order requiring the child to attend school remotely through a school in the father's jurisdiction, while ordering the involvement of the Office of the Children's Lawyer and a Voice of the Child Report.
