The applicant sought judicial review of a decision upholding his ineligibility for an enhanced allowance under Peel's Investment and Affordable Housing program.
The applicant argued he was denied procedural fairness and that the eligibility requirement of living in a self-contained unit was ambiguous.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding no denial of procedural fairness as the applicant was given reasons and opportunities to respond.
The court also held that the determination that the applicant's rooming house accommodation was not a self-contained unit was reasonable.
