The appellant appealed his conviction for speeding 120 km/h in an 80 km/h zone.
The appellant raised multiple grounds of appeal including alleged Charter violations regarding the use of the word "Offence" on the Notice of Trial, challenges to the radar device testing procedures, concerns about the certification of speed on the Certificate of Offence, jurisdictional issues, and objections to the amendment of the Certificate.
The appeal court dismissed all submissions, finding no Charter breach, no impropriety in the radar testing or certification, proper jurisdiction, and valid amendment procedures.
The conviction and sentence were upheld.
