The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied the benefits, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant claimed she suffered a concussion and psychological impairments warranting removal from the MIG.
The Tribunal found insufficient medical evidence to support a concussion or a psychological impairment, noting the applicant's pre-accident medical history of similar complaints.
The Tribunal concluded the injuries were predominantly minor, and since the MIG limits were exhausted, the disputed psychological assessment was not reasonable and necessary.
The claim for a special award was also dismissed.
