The applicant was injured in a rear-end motor vehicle accident and claimed weekly income benefits, alleging a substantial inability to perform her essential tasks in her family-run tile business.
The insurer denied the benefits.
At arbitration, surveillance evidence contradicted the applicant's testimony regarding her physical limitations and work attendance.
The arbitrator found the applicant's evidence unreliable and concluded she failed to prove a substantial inability to perform her essential job tasks.
The claim for weekly benefits was dismissed, but the applicant was awarded her expenses of the arbitration.
