The appellants appealed an order finding them in contempt of a previous court order and sought leave to appeal a costs order of approximately $92,000.
The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge's finding that the appellants knowingly and intentionally ignored the previous order and attempted to hide assets to frustrate the respondent's rights as a creditor.
The court also found no basis to interfere with the motion judge's exercise of discretion in awarding costs on a full indemnity basis.
The appeal was dismissed.
