The applicants, former board members of a hospice charity, sought judicial review and leave to appeal several rulings made by a court-appointed arbitrator regarding a disputed board election.
They also sought to set aside the election results based on alleged irregularities.
The court held that judicial review is not available for decisions of a private consensual arbitrator.
The court further found that the applicants were out of time to appeal most of the arbitral awards under the Arbitration Act, and regardless, the arbitrator made no errors of law.
Finally, the court declined to set aside the election results, finding that the alleged irregularities were minor and did not go to the heart of the electoral process.