The appellant appealed a judgment dismissing his motion to vary a consent divorce order.
The motion judge had ordered the appellant to continue paying $600 per month in spousal support for life, $150 per month for medical coverage until the respondent turned 65, and to maintain $100,000 in life insurance.
The appellant argued that fundamental changes in both parties' financial situations after age 65 warranted a variation.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the anticipated changes were uncertain and speculative, and that the current order was fair to both parties.
