Following a two‑day trial concerning custody, parenting time, and child support, the mother sought sole custody and continuation of an existing parenting schedule while the father sought joint custody and equal parenting time.
The court applied the best interests of the child test under the Divorce Act and considered factors under s. 24 of the Children’s Law Reform Act.
Evidence showed both parents had a positive relationship with the child and were able to communicate effectively about parenting decisions.
While the father sought equal parenting time, the court found the status quo arrangement provided stability and should continue.
Joint custody was ordered, the child’s primary residence remained with the mother, and the father was ordered to pay guideline child support based on imputed income.
