The appellant appealed an order dismissing his application for declaratory relief as statute-barred.
The appellant argued that under s. 16(1)(a) of the Limitations Act, there is no limitation period for his application.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the application implicitly sought consequential relief, taking it outside the scope of s. 16(1)(a).
The Court noted that any viable claim the appellant might have would be through an application for an order to pass accounts.