The appellants sought to examine a representative of the trustee in bankruptcy regarding its reports and an order permitting the assignment of thousands of leases without customer representation.
The motion judge adjourned the motion, directing the parties to exchange written questions and answers first.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the motion judge correctly exercised his discretion to adjourn the motion and await the trustee's answers before adjudicating the merits, including whether an affidavit is required under s. 215 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.
