The applicant sought interim spousal support following the breakdown of a 21‑year relationship and marriage with no dependent children.
The respondent acknowledged entitlement but disputed quantum, arguing declining corporate income and health issues.
The court applied the objectives of spousal support under the Divorce Act and principles governing interim support, emphasizing rough justice and maintaining the marital standard of living where the payor’s ability permits.
The court considered corporate income and retained earnings available to the respondent through a closely held corporation.
Interim spousal support of $8,500 per month was ordered, with retroactive effect and ancillary orders regarding health benefits and life insurance.