The applicant moved to set aside an order abandoning her spousal support claim, which was made during a settlement conference.
She alleged that her former counsel pressured her due to his unpreparedness and that her anxiety disorder impacted her decision.
The respondent opposed, arguing the applicant failed to establish grounds to set aside the order.
The court dismissed the motion, finding no evidence of fraud by counsel and that the applicant did not meet the preconditions under Family Law Rules 25(19) or the residual power test from Mountain View Farms.
The court emphasized the importance of finality in consent orders and the integrity of the administration of justice.
