1 total
Judicial review granted because RAD conflated two potential internal flight alternatives, rendering its decision unintelligible.
The applicant sought judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision dismissing his refugee claim based on the availability of an internal flight alternative (IFA) in Santa Barbara, Honduras.
The Federal Court found the RAD's decision unintelligible because it failed to distinguish between the city of Santa Barbara and the remote farm location in assessing the IFA test.
The application for judicial review was granted and the matter sent back for redetermination.
