The appellant landlord appealed a Small Claims Court decision dismissing her claims for utility arrears, maintenance charges, and rent against the respondent tenant.
The parties had previously appeared before the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB), which issued a consent order declining jurisdiction over current claims but retaining jurisdiction over future invoices.
The Divisional Court found the trial judge erred in law by failing to treat the LTB order as final and binding.
The court awarded the appellant $292 for utility arrears incurred prior to the LTB order, upheld the dismissal of the maintenance charges and older utility claims due to the limitation period, and awarded the appellant costs of the trial.