The plaintiff brought a motion under Rule 45.02 for an order requiring the defendant to pay $180,000 into court from the proceeds of a property sale, pending the final disposition of the action.
The parties had previously entered into a joint venture to invest in real estate, and the plaintiff claimed a one-third interest in the proceeds based on a trust agreement.
The defendant argued the trust agreement was superseded by a subsequent agreement.
The court found that the plaintiff met the three-part test for an order under Rule 45.02, as there was a specific fund, a serious issue to be tried regarding the claim to the fund, and the balance of convenience favoured granting the relief to prevent dissipation of the funds.
The motion was granted.