The appellant garnishee appealed two related Small Claims Court decisions regarding garnishment of debts owed to two debtors.
In the Ali matter, the Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the garnishee's representative had acknowledged the debt during informal proceedings, supporting the trial judge's implicit finding.
In the Seepersaud matter, the court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for a rehearing, as there was no evidentiary basis or acknowledgement of a debt by the garnishee.
