The appellant appealed a decision of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board denying compensation for eviction-related moving expenses.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that it lacked jurisdiction as the appeal did not raise a question of law under section 23 of the Compensation for Victims of Crimes Act.
Furthermore, the court held that the Board's factual finding that the expenses were unrelated to the subject incident was not patently unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
