The applicant sought payment for four chiropractic treatment plans following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied the plans on the basis that they were not reasonable and necessary.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet his burden of proof, noting that the treatment goals were identical across all plans, there was limited evidence of progress, and the treatment was not tailored to his predominantly minor physical injuries.
The Tribunal preferred the respondent's section 44 medical assessment and dismissed the application.
