The applicant sought judicial review of an arbitration award that allowed a union grievance regarding balance and deposit time for collectors on overtime shifts.
The applicant argued the arbitrator breached natural justice and reached an unreasonable decision by relying on a without-prejudice settlement.
The Divisional Court found that while the arbitrator erred in admitting the settlement, this did not amount to a denial of natural justice.
The court concluded the arbitrator's decision was reasonable as it was independently supported by uncontradicted evidence and the wording of a prior agreement.
