The applicant wife brought a motion seeking a preservation of assets order, a preservation of documents order, and an order to assign carriage and control of a condominium unit to her for purchase and appraisal.
The preservation of documents order was granted mutually by consent.
However, the preservation of assets order and the condominium order were denied due to the applicant's failure to provide a statutory basis, financial statements, a Net Family Property Statement, or any calculation of an alleged equalization payment.
The court found the applicant failed to meet the onus to demonstrate a likely equalization payment.
The motion was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay costs to the respondent.
