The moving party in a family law proceeding brought a motion seeking a vesting order to transfer ownership of an inherited property into the responding party's name, arguing it was necessary to make the property available to their joint creditor.
The court dismissed the motion, finding it lacked jurisdiction under the Estates Administration Act because the responding party only had a beneficial interest in the residue of the estate, not a specific property interest.
Furthermore, the court held it lacked jurisdiction under the Courts of Justice Act and the Family Law Act because there was no existing order establishing a payment liability against the responding party.
