The parties separated after a 14-year relationship.
The applicant sought a divorce, an unequal division of net family properties under s. 5(6) of the Family Law Act, and opposed the respondent's claim for spousal support.
The court valued a disputed cottage property at $56,000, preferring the respondent's appraiser.
The court dismissed the applicant's claim for an unequal division, finding that the respondent's use of his significant pre-marriage assets for joint family purposes did not render an equalization unconscionable.
The applicant was ordered to pay an equalization payment of $92,338.55.
The respondent's claim for spousal support was dismissed, as the court imputed income to him and found he had not established entitlement based on need.
