The moving party sought leave to appeal an interlocutory decision appointing a trust company as her interim guardian of property, pending an application by her daughters to be appointed as guardians.
The moving party argued the motions judge erred by ignoring her valid Power of Attorney and failing to find strong evidence of misconduct before appointing a third party.
The Divisional Court denied leave to appeal, finding no conflicting decisions or good reason to doubt the correctness of the motions judge's decision, which was based on the incapable person's best interests and allegations of self-dealing.
