The defendant brought three requests under Rules 2.1.01 and 2.1.02 to dismiss or stay the action and two motions as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process.
The self-represented plaintiff had commenced an action arising from a purported vehicle purchase, claiming the defendant accepted a non-negotiable promissory note as payment by updating his order status.
The court found the statement of claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action, the grandiose damages claims ranging from $30,000,000 to $8,000,000,000 were far beyond what any reasonable person would expect, and the plaintiff's ongoing multiple filings, misuse of legal terminology, baseless allegations against counsel and the court, and attempts to enforce unilaterally created PPSA registrations were hallmarks of vexatious litigation.
The proceedings were dismissed in their entirety.
