The applicant brought a motion to change a 2011 final order, seeking to reduce his child and spousal support obligations due to an alleged decrease in income.
The respondent opposed the motion and sought to set aside the 2011 order, alleging it was obtained by fraudulent misrepresentation regarding the applicant's property purchases.
The court dismissed both motions, finding the applicant failed to prove a material change in circumstances and the respondent failed to meet the high threshold for fraud.
However, the court ordered adjustments to child support to reflect periods when two of the children were no longer eligible.
