C. McInnis

The applicant sought an order under the Partition Act for the listing and sale of a jointly-owned property, requesting sole carriage of the sale.

The respondent opposed, seeking a co-listing and the right to bid on the property without restrictions.

The court found that the respondent's prior conduct had distorted the sale process and depressed the property's value.

The court granted the applicant sole carriage of the sale, ordered the property listed with the applicant's chosen realtor, and established parameters allowing the respondent to bid through an independent realtor.

The applicant and respondent separated in 2014 and have twin boys.

The applicant sought retroactive and ongoing child support, arguing the respondent was intentionally underemployed, and requested contribution to the children's rep hockey expenses under section 7 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines.

The court imputed income to the respondent for 2016 and 2019, finding he was intentionally unemployed in 2016 to assist a new partner.

The court ordered the respondent to pay child support arrears, ongoing support, and a capped contribution to the children's rep hockey expenses, balancing the children's interests with the respondent's modest means.

Family law trial addressing custody, access, child support, spousal support, equalization of net family property, and sale of matrimonial real estate following separation.

The court granted the mother sole custody of the child and established a graduated access schedule for the father beginning with supervised access and transitioning to unsupervised weekend access.

Retroactive child support and spousal support were denied because the father's share of rental profits retained by the mother since separation was sufficient to offset those obligations, though ongoing guideline child support was ordered based on imputed income.

The parties were ordered to sell jointly owned real properties with proceeds applied to debts and then divided equally, subject to an equalization payment from the father.

The father was also ordered to sign passport documentation for the child subject to notice restrictions on relocation.