The applicant brought a motion for a refraining order to prevent the Family Responsibility Office from suspending his driver's licence due to alleged child support arrears, and for a stay of enforcement.
The applicant provided evidence of a 2010 agreement between counsel that all support obligations were resolved.
The court granted the refraining order conditionally, finding the applicant established a prima facie case and would suffer hardship if his licence were suspended.
However, the court adjourned the motion to stay enforcement and suspend the support deduction order, requiring the applicant to serve the support recipient so she could be heard.