The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied benefits, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The Tribunal found that the applicant suffered a psychological injury, specifically severe anxiety and depression, warranting removal from the MIG.
The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the applicant's psychologist over the respondent's expert, whose report was found to be internally inconsistent.
The applicant was awarded $2,200.00 for a psychological assessment and interest on overdue benefits, but the claim for a special award was dismissed.
