The respondent mother brought a motion for retroactive and prospective child support and financial disclosure.
The applicant father, residing in the United States, contested Ontario's jurisdiction.
The court found the father had consented and attorned to Ontario's jurisdiction.
The court ordered prospective child support based on the father's current employment income but dismissed the claim for retroactive support as neither party addressed the relevant legal factors.
The court also ordered a nominal contribution to section 7 expenses and mandated further financial disclosure from the father.
