The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that declared his human rights application abandoned after he failed to respond to a Case Assessment Direction.
The applicant's counsel argued that they never received the direction due to mail delays caused by an ice storm.
The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the direction was sent by courier, not mail, and the applicant failed to provide evidence from the courier company or the Tribunal Registry to support the claim of non-delivery.
