The appellant, C.K., appealed his sentence of six years concurrent for assault, assault causing bodily harm, sexual assault, and unlawful confinement.
The appeal raised two issues: an alleged miscalculation of pre-sentence custody credit and an unreasonable delay between conviction and sentence.
The Court of Appeal found no error in the pre-sentence custody calculation.
Regarding the delay, the court noted that a significant portion was attributable to the appellant's own application and other factors, and thus the total delay was not unreasonable.
Leave to appeal sentence was granted, but the appeal itself was dismissed.