The applicant wife brought a motion for interim spousal support.
The respondent husband, a police officer, was suspended with base pay due to criminal charges laid by the applicant.
The court found the applicant entitled to interim spousal support.
The court declined to impute higher income to the respondent, finding his suspension did not constitute intentional under-employment while criminal charges remained pending.
The court imputed the applicant's income at a discounted rate of $45,000 to account for her recent return to work and health issues.
