The court dismissed the plaintiffs' action for $60 million in damages as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process under Rule 2.1.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The action lacked a plausible cause of action, alleged events from decades ago, included claims against former counsel and the Law Society, made serious unsubstantiated allegations against non-parties, relied on odd and irrelevant claims, and involved unusual procedural steps.
The plaintiffs failed to provide submissions despite being invited to do so.